Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorna Tan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lorna Tan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lorna Tan is not a notable person. This looks like a resume Mohann Jasturba (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are tens of thousands of people in similar or higher position than her in Singapore.

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, have added women project to article talkpage so participants are notified of afd.Coolabahapple (talk) 13:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:JOURNALIST. Safehaven86 (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as essentially a job listing with there being no actual significance for an article from the listed information, the sources are also not substantiating any claims for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.